Why Does Mexico Outrank U.S. in Access to Civil Justice?
October 14, 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12f2e/12f2ea42b50bc3732f39d09fd0b443a939686142" alt="Scale_of_justice_gold_wiki"
When the poor and even the middle class can’t afford legal help to seek redress for basic civil disputes and access to institutions is blocked, the result is a disenchanted populace that may be tempted to take matters into their own hands.
You know, like Sharron Angle’s Second Amendment remedies.
Among the 11 wealthiest nations, the U.S. ranked ninth or below on six of the nine factors used, including 10th on absence of corruption and fundamental rights and dead last on access to civil justice.
When it comes to access, the United States was at the bottom of 11 developed nations. That’s right, dead last. Some third world countries did a better job at offering their citizens access to civil justice than we did.
Access to civil justice covers such factors, as knowing what remedies are available, affordable legal representation and the absence of barriers to the process for average people. Enforcement of the law should also be fair and impartial. The U.S. couldn’t manage to do any of these things well.
We didn’t fare much better in the fundamental rights category. The U.S. ranked 10th. Think about that. The developed countries of Australia, Sweden, Netherlands, Canada, Spain, Australia, South Korea, Japan and France provide better and more meaningful fundamental rights to their people than we do. Only Singapore scored worse than the U.S.
Our legal institutions are failing miserably at protecting basic fundamental rights. And justice may be blind, but it does no good when the majority of Americans can’t even make it past the front door.
The full study is available here. Read it and weep.
No comments:
Post a Comment